Definitions:
“Quality
assurance” means
the planned and systematic actions that provide adequate confidence that
a diagnostic facility will produce consistently high-quality images with minimum
exposure of the patients and healing arts personnel. The determination of what
constitutes high quality will be made by the facility producing the images.
Quality assurance actions include both “quality control” techniques and
“quality administration” procedures.
“Quality
assurance program”
means an organized entity designed to provide “quality assurance” for
diagnostic radiology facilities. The nature and extent of this program will vary
with the size and type of the facility, the type of examinations conducted and
other factors.
“Quality
administration procedures” are those management actions intended to guarantee
that monitoring techniques are properly performed and evaluated and that
necessary corrective measure are taken in response to monitoring results. These
procedures provide the organizational framework for the quality assurance
program.
Purpose
of Quality Assurance Programme for Radiology Department:
To address verification and validation
of imaging methods, surveillance
of imaging results, periodic calibration
and maintenance of equipment’s and proper documentation of Corrective and preventive
actions.
The QA programme for imaging
should involve all stakeholders. It should be a comprehensive programme
addressing equipment QA, Protocols, safety, education and surveillance. In
addition, AERB requirement will have to be met.
Objective of Quality
Assurance Programme for Radiology Department:
- To ensure the accuracy of the diagnosis.
- The minimum radiation dose should be delivered to the patient to achieve the objective of the diagnostic or interventional procedures.
- The Quality Assurance tests of machine should be carried out thereafter at regular intervals (periodicity-once in two years)
- To ensure the Regular Maintenance and Calibrations of the equipment
Quality
Assurance Programme for Radiology Department:
Periodic
Internal / External Peer Review of Imaging Protocols:
A peer review system
will be in place to review the reports and outcomes of interventional
procedures performed. This shall be done in a structured manner, and the sample
size, periodicity for each modality shall be defined. The results of such
reviews shall be discussed with all stake holders in "discrepancy
meetings" and the same shall be documented. The peer review can be
performed by the head of department or by a group of peers, with or without blinding
of the original reports. Discrepancies in the reports will be graded on the severity
and impact on changes on patient management strategy, and the corrective and
preventive actions taken to minimize these will be documented. The purpose is
to prevent errors in future, and continuous quality improvement rather than computation
or error rates of the individuals.
Surveillance of Imaging
Results:
Structured peer review
of the imaging protocols and procedures shall be periodically performed and
they should be modified in accordance of the current best practices.
Surveillance of the quality of images, and completeness of the imaging
procedures should be performed to ensure that they are appropriate for the
indications for which the imaging has been performed.
For example:
CT for
acute renal colic requires only a low dose non-contrast CT and a multiphase CT
urography would expose the patient to unnecessary radiation and contrast media
injection; while for Obstructive uropathy with urosepsis will require it to be tailored
for identifying abscesses, and hence would be multiphase CT.
Ensure the
appropriateness of the investigations and procedures for the clinical
indication:
The investigation
orders are screened prior to performing of the imaging or interventional
procedure to ensure that they are appropriate investigation (as per current
best practice guidelines and patient safety) based on for the clinical indication, otherwise
alternate investigations are offered in consultation with the treating doctor.
For Example:
Mammography for a lactating 25 yrs old lady with fever and a lump
is inappropriate, and will never reveal the breast abscess; Ultrasound scan of
the breast will be the best investigation.
Periodic Calibration
and Maintenance of All Equipment:
Quality Assurance
including calibration and maintenance of all equipment will be performed as per
AERB guidelines, as well as the manufacturer's recommendations and records of
the same shall be maintained. All such activities will be performed by persons
who are appropriately trained and certified by the regulatory authorities for
this purpose. Traceability certificates of all Calibrations done by calibrated
equipment shall be maintained.
Documentation of
corrective and preventive actions:
In case of any
deviations noted from the laid down quality assurance programme, the organisation
shall institute corrective and preventive actions as may be appropriate.
Quality Assurance Test
for Radiology Equipment:
Written by:
Dr. Praveen Bajpai
Director of Ingenious Healthcare Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Founder of Skill Sathi
MBA in Hospital administration, PG Diploma in Quality Accreditation, PG Diploma in Medico Legal System, M. Phil in Hospital Mgmt. from BITS Pilani, P.hD in Management, Certified NABH Auditor, Certified NABL Auditor, Certified Auditor for Clinical Audits, Green Belt in Six Sigma, Certified in Hospital Infection Control Practices, Certified trainer for International Patient Safety Goals, Certified Auditor for JCI 7th Edition Standards
www.skillsathi.in
Comments
Post a Comment